Ad

Saturday, 15 August 2015

Head of Pope's Gang of Nine and the Shadow Council

Head of Pope’s Gang of Nine to Speak at ‘Shadow Council II’

Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga will take part in conference attacking Church doctrine

ROME, August 14, 2015 (ChurchMilitant.com) - One of the Pope's closest advisors will be taking part in a conference whose aim is to undermine Church teaching on marriage.
LifeSiteNews is reporting that Cdl. Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga, charged with reform of the Curia and head of the Pope's "Gang of Nine," is slated to speak at a Rome conference that will promote a more liberal understanding of marriage and the family. Organized by the International Academy for Marital Spirituality (INTAMS), a Belgian Catholic group that welcomes ecumenical dialogue, the conference will be held September 10–12, and will include voices advocating change in the Church.
Cardinal Maradiaga is nicknamed the "Vice Pope" because of the authority he wields in Rome and because of his close friendship with Pope Francis. Maradiaga has been the source of controversy on several occasions. 
A talk he offered in Texas in 2013 was seen by many as little more than a blueprint for revolution. Titled "The Importance of the New Evangelization," his talk focused on the motives behind Vatican II, a time when the Church, according to the cardinal, "did not have a monopoly on truth anymore, nor could she pontificate on a thousand human matters, or hold stances denoting arrogance or superiority." He promoted a socialist vision for the Church, where She makes "it a community of equals, without castes or classes; without rich or poor; without impositions or anathemas."
Maradiaga was also longtime head of Caritas Internationalis, the Vatican's largest charitable arm, which happens to be a member of the governing body of the World Social Forum — a Communist, pro-homosexual group. Before receiving the red hat, Maradiaga was a well-known promoter of the condemned Liberation Theology back in Honduras.
At least one prominent German theologian who took part in the "Shadow Council" of May 2015 will be present at the upcoming conference: Professor Eberhard Schockenhoff, professor of moral theology at the University of Freiburg, will offer a talk titled "Indissolubility and Theology of Marriage."
At the May Shadow Council organized by Cardinal Reinhard Marx, head of the German Bishops Conference, Schockenhoff spoke about a "theology of love" and rejected the ideal of the indissolubility of marriage.
"In the first place, it should be admitted that love can indeed end," he said. "If two persons make the definitive decision of a common project of life, this does not mean they cannot review their choice."
According to him, the marriage vow should only be "founded on what love in fact wants," and "the indissolubility of marriage is not a prescriptive aspect which is brought from outside; it is rather a request that spouses make to themselves, when they trust in their love."
INTAMS describes itself as an organization "dedicated to the study of and dialogue about the meaning and relevance of marriage in the context of contemporary society." 
INTAMS' work is characterized by academic freedom and its openness to honest and critical intellectual inquiry. Rooted in the Roman Catholic tradition, INTAMS' approach is open to and includes contributions from all Christian traditions. INTAMS brings together scholars and research results from different countries and cultural backgrounds.
Along these lines, INTAMS promotes interdenominational debates over marriage. One of its books consists of a collection of essays from Catholic and Protestant authors promoting various views of marriage. Among the contributors are Godfried Cardinal Daneels and Carlo Maria Cardinal Martini, two well-known liberal prelates who have promoted progessive ideas about homosexuality and Church teaching. Among the views presented in INTAMS' collection are promotion of a married priesthood and the existence of "an erotic dimension" to the love of the Holy Trinity, among others.According to the group, "the ecumenical dimension remains primordial" in the discussion of marital spirituality.
INTAMS describes its upcoming September conference thus:
This international Symposium, which is open to everyone interested, will provide renewed reflection as well as fresh perspectives on a number of issues that need to be addressed, such as the relation between doctrine and pastoral practice, the sense of the faithful, an ethics of mercy, and indissolubility in the context of a contemporary theology of marriage.
The description refers to the debate that raged before, during and after last year's Synod on the Family with regard to the question of Holy Communion to the divorced and remarried — pushed heavily by German cardinals Reinhard Marx and Walter Kasper as well as other prelates of a more progressive bent. It may also refer to other forms of union not recognized by the Church: same-sex couples or individuals who are cohabiting.

Christine Niles is a staff writer, producer and anchor for ChurchMilitant.com

Follow Christine on Twitter: @ChristineNiles1

The Vortex—Gay Priest Cavalcade | The Vortex



THE VORTEX—GAY PRIEST CAVALCADE

by Michael Voris, S.T.B.  •   July 21, 2015  The Vortex 545 COMMENTS
FILED UNDER: HOMOSEXUALITY
TRANSCRIPT
A faculty member priest in Sacred Heart Seminary here in Detroit recently made an announcement to the entire seminary student collective — about 60 young men — that they need to be sure and wear their bathrobes coming out of the bathroom showers instead of just towels because a number of their brother seminarians are gay, and the guys in towels are occasions of sin for the gay guys.

If you have successfully picked your jaw up off the floor and are ready to ask if you heard that right — you did. Another faculty member told a class that the seminary accepts men with homosexual pasts. A few weeks ago, the seminary had a big fancy gala dinner which raised almost $900,000 for the seminary fund. This is the brochure. Church Militant even bought the center page advertisement as a means to express some support. I took quite a number of classes there a few years ago and was taught by some very good professors. 
So when we received this information, we were floored.  After checking it out — it's true.

I wonder how many of the Catholics who bought ad space in here or one of the $250-a-plate dinners would now want their money back? This isn't to pick on Detroit, despite what some may say. It's just that this information which was easily verifiable points out a very big reality in the Church these days: the non-stop, continuous effort to appease the homosexual agenda — to which the question must be asked: Is there no end to the bending over backwards going on in the Church these days among the clerical class to not hurt the feelings of people who have given themselves over to sexual perversion — namely those who have embraced the so-called gay lifestyle?

It seems there are more ministries, apologies, press releases, over-the-top compassionate language, never-ending discussions, bulletin announcements and so forth than you could shake a stick at. Some dioceses like Chicago, for example, actually have an entire office in the chancery dedicated to the gay agenda. They call it a ministry, but everyone knows it's little else than a hotbed for permitting anti-Catholic voices to say their piece under the guise of being Catholic.

It was started under the notoriously homosexuality-supporting Cardinal Joseph Bernardin and has continued since. The homosexuality of many of the Chicago clergy is almost unparalleled. Almost.

In the halcyon days of men like Bernardin, in the 70s and 80s, all kinds of bishops were gay or gay-friendly and were anxious to push the cause most dear to their hearts. They introduced gay Masses into their dioceses (gay Masses which continue to this day), advanced the clerical careers of gay men — homosexuals who have kept the sodomite agenda going strong. These men in their turn produced another generation of men very friendly to the homosexual cause — men like recently retired Rochester New York bishop Matthew Clark who passed his subtle twistings of the Faith onto men in today's episcopate, like New York cardinal Timothy Dolan.

When you know that a man like Matthew Clark, who continually excused and side-stepped homosexual issues, was the spiritual director to Cdl. Dolan in his youth, then you begin to understand why Dolan can lead the St. Patrick's Day Parade in New York and be pleased that a militant same-sex "marriage"-supporting homosexual group was in it; or say "Bravo" to the whole line of questioning about homosexual NFL draftee Michael Sam; or be totally AWOL on the New York state gay "marriage" debate in 2011; or still to this day have not issued any reaction to the SCOTUS sodomite marriage ruling.

It makes total sense. Many of today's groups of bishops, even if they somehow cling to some vestiges of some degree of orthodoxy, have been malformed by the preceding generation of bishops who were enthralled, for various reasons, with the whole emerging gay rights movement. But Bishop Matthew Clark and Cardinal Joseph Bernardin were not alone — not by a long shot. Just down the road from Clark was recently retired bishop Howard Hubbard who had his own explosion of homosexuality in his diocese.

Like Rochester, the diocese which encompasses the state capitol of Albany was also a factory for gay and gay-friendly priests, as was Los Angeles, Miami, and practically anywhere Cdl. Theodore McCarrick came to town. These men, and those they promoted through the system, laid the groundwork for what we see today: a gay establishment within the Church, a parallel magisterium that controls much of what goes on on the macro level. There is hardly a bishop in the U.S. who doesn't know this is not true. They all know it. It's why they never ever never refute any of this.

The gang at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops knows if they ever tried to deny one single syllable of this, they would open a can of worms which would destroy many of their careers and even possibly expose them to various legal actions. So they walk a very thin, dangerous line of trying to continue promoting what they want while also appearing to uphold Church teaching. And their great disguise for all this activity is the appeal to mercy.

Here's a question: Where are all the Church establishment ministries for spouses who have to deal with a cheating spouse? There are Catholic LGBT ministries and Masses and banners all over the place in practically every diocese in the country — but where are all those corresponding ministries for abandoned moms, fatherless children, victims of spousal infidelity?

It's a fair bet that there are many more Catholics in these situations than there are Catholics who embrace the sodomy lifestyle. So why are there zillions of gay support ministries, and almost none of the other? Do you know any Catholic husbands or wives who either suspect or have confirmed they have been cheated on? Well, too bad you can't direct them to the 6 o'clock Mass at the parish for Catholic victims of that evil.  And why can't you? Because that sort of stuff never pops up on the radar of homosexual men who are bishops or priests. Not to put too fine a point on it, but they don't care because something that the vast majority of heterosexual Catholics face they can't relate to.

They have so homosexualized the Church that all the attention is on this very narrow almost sliver of people the so-called compassion and mercy train never seems to pull into the depot of the everyday Catholic. And one last group that is significantly overlooked: What about a parish and diocesan-blessed ministry for the heartbroken faithful Catholics whose family members have given in to the sin of the sodomite lifestyle?

Until they do that — and much more — the sodomite-friendly clergy will continue to reveal their true agenda of advancing the homosexual cause and wrecking the faith of millions.

Unmasking the Satanic Temple



Satanic ‘Pink’ Mass

by Church Militant  •   July 21, 2015   35 COMMENTS
FILED UNDER: SATANISM, BISHOPS
By Joseph Pelletier, member of the PAUSE program
For the past few weeks, the Satanic Temple has been in the spotlight concerning the controversial unveiling of a satanic statue in downtown Detroit. The Temple, by its nature, is a reclusive and shadowy organization, so it shouldn't come as a surprise that even when given center stage it masks and skirts around the true intentions of its agenda: the destruction of the Catholic Church.  
In an interview that aired earlier this month on WJBK-TV, president of the Detroit chapter of the Satanic Temple Jex Blackmore, in defending her beliefs, played the role of victim, claiming that there is a "deep misunderstanding about satanism as a religion" and that satanism is simply "a non-theistic religious organization that has political and activist undertones" (a description that contradicts itself, as theism is the essence of religion). According to Blackmore, "We understand Satan not in the Judeo-Christian concept, but in a literary and philosophical history in which Satan is a cultural hero" who rebelled against "systems of authority and power."
Despite her argument (and attempts to garner sympathy), this definition is essentially indistinguishable from the Judeo-Christian interpretation: Satan is the quintessential revolutionary who rejected the rule of the Ultimate Authority. However, the Temple's definition of Lucifer differs in one key area: They deny his existence.
The saying goes: "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist," for if there is a Prince of Darkness, there must also be a Prince of Light. In admitting that they believe in Satan as a being, the Satanic Temple must also acknowledge the existence of God, and in acknowledging the existence of God they must acknowledge His One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. It is, of course, less beneficial to their cause to openly admit they seek to undermine the foundations of the Church than it is to hide their intentions under the guise of the pursuit of reason and scientific understanding. Therefore, they must, as they have, claim the erection of a satanic statue at the Oklahoma state capitol is not to mock Christianity but instead to create dialogue. "The purpose of the monument," explains Blackmore, "is to stand in contrast and conversation with established religious icons such as the 10 Commandments." 
If one actually needs proof that the very existence of the Satanic Temple is to mock the Catholic Church, one need not look farther than its website. The tab icon features an inverted cross, a direct perversion of the Crucifixion, as do multiple photographs taken inside the Temple. President Blackmore can also be seen wearing the upside-down cross around her neck in several photographs. This itself is acknowledgement that despite claims to equally oppose all "theistic religions," there exists a particularly strong animosity toward Christianity. 
The Detroit Temple also made headlines in December for creating a display known as the "Snaketivity Scene." The satanic alternative to the Nativity featured a snake wrapped around a cross. A banner on the cross read "The Greatest Gift is Knowledge," and a copy of the book Revolt of the Angels sat at its base. Again, this only further solidifies the argument that the purpose of the Satanic Temple is to specifically pervert the traditions and beliefs of Christians. 
According to the official Introductory Primer of the Satanic Temple, one of its featured campaigns (which also includes support for so-called "marriage equality") is the "Pink Mass." Described as a ceremony "designed to 'make the deceased gay in the after-life,'" the ritual includes the reading of scriptures, lighting of candles and ceremonial proceedings that involve two homosexuals kissing over the grave of the deceased while a High Priest, complete with horns, oversees the act. This begs the question: If the Satanic Temple seeks to merely join the ranks of other religions and be accepted as merely an alternative to "theistic religion," then why call grave desecration a Mass? Why take the name of the integral part of the Catholic faith and defile it by association with a graphic ritual? The answers are abundantly clear. 
To make matters worse, the archdiocese of Detroit has been absent amid the controversy. Remaining inactive or apathetic toward a situation that requires one's diect condemnation is nearly tantamount to complicity. Faithful Catholic opposition has not been wholly absent, however. Many local churches have taken it on themselves to held special Masses of Reparation and Holy Hours specifically scheduled on July 25, the day of the unveiling. "We wanted to do something," says Teresa Chisholm , a parishioner of St. Joseph Catholic Church on Jay Street in Detroit, "and the Mass is the most powerful prayer. So it seemed fitting to have a Mass along with confession, to repent for our own sins and to pray in reparation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus."

‘False Prophets Inside the Church’ Bishop Athansius Schneider speaks out

Bishop: ‘False Prophets Inside the Church’

Bishop: ‘False Prophets Inside the Church’

"A certain clerical pressure group" is pushing a politically correct Marxist agenda

False prophets in the Church are trying to hijack the upcoming Synod on the Family and impose an anti-Catholic ideology.
That's the latest warning from Kazakhstan's tradition-minded bishop Athanasius Schneider inanother wide-ranging new interview, this time with Ireland's Catholic Voice.
He says the Instrumentum Laboris, the working document for October's synod, pushes "the agenda of a certain clerical pressure group" seeking to change divine law and let divorced adulterers receive Communion, among other things.
Right off the bat, Bp. Schneider rejects the notion, found in the Instrumentum Laboris, that there's a "common accord" among the synod fathers about a special "penitential way" for civilly divorced and remarried Catholics to return to receiving the Eucharist without actually avoiding sin or its near occasion.
The affirmation that there is a "common accord" on the "penitential way" is not correct. The only one public document that would permit to determine the effective opinion of the bishops on this topic, is the "Relatio Synodi" of 2014. There it is documented that 40 percent of the members of the Synod rejected such a "penitential way." When faced with such a result, one can hardly speak of a "common accord." Furthermore, there is no specification as to a concrete definition of such a "penitential way."
Bishop Schneider suggests that the Instrumentum Laboris itself serves as evidence of a certain agenda among a certain faction of the synod's bishops.
In the light of a careful analysis of the facts, one is left with the suspicion that the authors of the Instrumentum Laboris try to push forward the agenda of a certain clerical pressure group in order to change the Divine law of the non-admission the divorced and remarried to Holy Communion.
He then takes on a statement by Abp. Bruno Forte, considered to have been a major influence on the Synod's discussion summaries, who insists that the Synod discussions must heavily focus on whether the civilly divorced and remaried — i.e., remarried adulterers — can serve as godparents, catechists and extraordinary ministers of holy Communion.
Firstly, it is necessary to remember the significance of godparents according to the constant teaching and practice of the Church: A sponsor (godfather or godmother) must help the baptized person to lead a Christian life in keeping with baptism and to fulfill faithfully the obligations inherent in it. To be permitted to take on the function of sponsor a person must be a Catholic who leads a life of faith in keeping with the function to be taken on (cf. Canons 872 and 874 § 1, 3). Sponsors and those who take the place of parents are obliged to form the children by word and example in faith and in the practice of Christian life (cf. Canon 774, § 2). When a godfather or a godmother or a catechist conducts a lifestyle that publicly contradicts the Sixth Commandment and the indissolubility of the Christian marriage, then he or she surely cannot be an example of a life of faith. The same is valid for extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist. The advocacy for the admission of divorced and remarried to the task of godparents and catechists cannot ultimately be for the true spiritual good of the children, but turns out to be an istrumentalization of a specific ideological agenda. This is a dishonesty and a mockery of the institution of godparents and catechists who by means of a public promise took on the task of educators of the faith. In the case of godparents or catechists who are divorced and remarried, their life however, continuously contradicts their words, and so they have to face the admonition of the Holy Spirit through the mouth of the Apostle Saint James: "But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves" (James 1: 22).
Regarding the apparent openness of some bishops to the idea that the Church could ever endorse homosexual civil unions, Bp. Schneider emphatically shuts down the heterodox liberal fantasy.
This can never be an authentic Catholic position because it contradicts directly the words of God, which says that homosexual acts and the homosexual lifestyle are a grievous offense of the will of God (cf. Gen 18:20; Lev 18:22; 20:13; Is 3:9; Rom 1:26-27; 1 Cor 6:10; 1 Tim 1:10; Jud 7). Committing evil in a long-term and even loving relationship cannot transform the same evil into good. Only true repentance that includes contrition and the firm intention to avoid the evil cancels with the grace of God the evil. It would be absurd to affirm that alcoholism will gain a positive recognition because of the long-term and loving relationship of two persons who established this relationship on the base of their propensity to alcohol. The same absurdity contains the above-mentioned affirmation about same sex unions. 
He was just as closed to the ongoing suggestions that the Church needs to tone down its language. Bishop Schneider identified such proposals as the work of a devious ideology.
We have to call things by their real names; otherwise, we will deceive the others and ourselves. To call the things by their names does not mean an intention to create discrimination, provided we speak with respect and pedagogical wisdom. There exist some deficiency symptoms of a bodily or spiritual nature such as fear of heights, claustrophobia, seasickness, shortsightedness etc. No person of common sense will be indignant when we name such phenomena as a deficiency. In fact, the homosexual attraction is in itself a sexual-psychological deficiency symptom, which all civilized human history has considered as a deficiency and called by its name. Under pressure from the new gender ideology, which has its roots in the Marxist ideology, in the 1970s homosexuality was excluded from the International Handbook of Psychological diseases. In such a way, persons who suffer with homosexual attraction were taken hostages of a radical ideology, inasmuch as they are denied the opportunity to receive healing or improvement of their psychologically defective situation. To have a deficiency is not a shame, but it is a fact. Those who effectively encourage deficient persons, in our case persons who are feeling a homosexual attraction, to abuse their deficiency in order to become more deficient and to consequently become addicts, commit a grave injustice towards these persons who need and want to receive help in their spiritual and psychological deficiency.
Departing from the topic of the Synod, Bp. Schneider was then asked what a bishop should do if a Catholic hospital in his diocese decides to comply with abortion legislation and agree to murder unborn babies. Such was the case with Mater Misericordiae University Hospital in Dublin.
The duty of a Catholic bishop in such a case is to deprive the hospital the title "Catholic" and remind his faithful that accomplices of the horrible crime of abortion commit a grave sin and are threatened with excommunication. The punishment of excommunication is a medicinal measure in order to prevent the guilty person from committing further crimes and so to ensure his eternal salvation. This was the method of God Himself (the preaching of judgement and punishment through the Prophets), of Our Lord Jesus Christ (the speech of excommunication in Mt 18: 15-18) and of the Apostles (the excommunication realized by Saint Paul, cf. 1 Cor 5: 4-5) and so it has to be also the method of the Church. When the Church desists of this Divine method, she will be no more faithful to God, she will be no more a real mother who punishes her child in order to save it. On the contrary, such a church will be a false mother who disastrously pampers the child to its damage or a stepmother who is indifferent about the child’s salvation. The following words of excommunication pronounced by Saint Paul and inspired by the Holy Spirit, remain valid for all periods of the Church’s history inclusively for our days: "With the power of our Lord Jesus we deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord" (1 Cor 5: 4-5).
Bishop Schneider further commented on the Irish clergy — including one bishop — who directly or indirectly gave the OK for Catholics to vote in favor of the recent referendum in their country to legalize same-sex "marriage."
Those clerics who encouraged the faithful to vote for same sex marriage revealed themselves by this same fact as false prophets, as those who pervert the Word of God. They revealed themselves as public liars, to whom are fully applicable these words of Holy Scripture: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter" (Is 5:20) and: "Your prophets have seen for you false and deceptive visions; they have not exposed your iniquity to restore your fortunes, but have seen for you oracles that are false and misleading" (Lam 2: 14). To such priests and bishops the Apostle Paul without any doubt would say today these words: "Such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ" (2 Cor 11:13). In order to remedy this situation it is firstly necessary that faithful Bishops teach clearly and unambiguously the truth of Christ and correct explicitly the teaching of these false prophets.
Finally, the traditional bishop turns to positive ways the faithful can fight the devious agenda to rout the Church.
First, he believes, we must devote ourselves to consistent prayer and ask God to intervene on the behalf of Truth. But he also offers some specific ideas to supplement those petitions.
Furthermore, we have to expose and defend the Divine truth about marriage and family in written and oral forms, exercising hereby the service of the truth as an important gesture of our love for our neighbour. When there exists sure elements of proof one should try to unmask the machinations of the false prophets inside the Church. Saint Peter, the first Pope, wrote in his second Encyclical Letter the following words, which are applicable to those priests and bishops who teach in our days the goodness of the homosexual lifestyle and the legitimacy of receiving Holy Communion by those who live publicly in an adulterous partnership: "There will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who redeemed them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed. And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep." (2 Peter 2: 1-3).
In addition, Bp. Schneider implores Catholics to develop a greater appreciation and knowledge of the saints throughout Church history who have helped spiritually battle evil. Namely, he urges reading about St. Athanasius, St. Gregory VII, St. John Fisher and St. Pius X, as well as lay saints and religious figures like St. Catherine of Siena, St. Thomas More, Gabriel Garcia Moreno and Jerome Lejeune.

Ryan Fitzgerald is a staff writer and producer for ChurchMilitant.com
Follow Ryan on Twitter: @RyanFitz1111

http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bishop-false-prophets-inside-the-church

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Fatima, Noah and Sodomy

Artist Gustave Doré

 
Fatima,
the Time of Noah
Related Same-Sex Marriage
 

Fatima Most Catholics know the story well. Throughout the night of October 12 and all during the morning of October 13, a cold, heavy rain fell, saturating the ground and the 70,000 pilgrims who had come to see the foretold miracle. Once the sun had reached its zenith, and after Our Lady appeared to the children, the rain suddenly stopped, and the clouds parted without even a breeze. At that moment, many witnesses described seeing a world of colors around them, as if they were inside a rainbow. Then, the sun appeared to fall to earth as if it was going to destroy the world, only to return to its own position, leaving everyone, including the ground and their clothes, perfectly dry. Eyewitness accounts of this give us an idea of what they saw:
Photo at Fatima during the Miracle of the Sun
 “[T]he sun turned everything to different colors—yellow, blue and white. Then it shook and trembled. It looked like a wheel of fire that was going to fall on the people. They began to cry out, ‘We shall all be killed!’ Others called to Our Lady to save them. They recited acts of contrition. One woman began to confess her sins aloud, advertising that she had done this and that… When at last the sun stopped leaping and moving, we all breathed our relief.” – Maria Carreira
“During those long moments of the solar prodigy, objects around us turned all the colors of the rainbow. We saw ourselves blue, yellow, red, etc. All the strange phenomena increased the fears of the people.” – Father Ignacio Lorenco
 “Suddenly the rain ceased, the clouds separated and I saw a large sun, brighter than the sun, yet I could look at it without hurting my eyes, as if it were only the moon.”

Original photo of the Miracle of the Sun
 “This sun began to get larger and larger, brighter and brighter until the whole heavens seemed more brilliantly lighted than I have ever seen it. Then the sun started spinning and shooting streams of light, which changed it to all colors of the rainbow… At the same time, it started getting bigger and bigger in the sky as though it were headed directly for us, as though it were falling on the earth. Everyone was frightened. We all thought it was the end of the world.” – Mary Allen



In a more succinct way, the Miracle of Fatima can be described like this: Intense rain, followed by a rainbow of sorts, the sun falling to the earth as if to burn it up, only to have the sun return to its proper place, leaving the witnesses and the ground perfectly dry. This sequence should sound familiar. In the book of Genesis, we read that God sent a flood to wipe out all mankind save for Noah and his family. Then came a rainbow, as a covenant that He would never again destroy the world by a flood. But what of the sun descending upon the earth as if to destroy it? In the 17th chapter of Luke’s Gospel, Jesus explains to His disciples:
Jesus preaching
“In the days when the Son of Man comes, all will be as it was in the days of Noe; they ate, they drank, they married and were given in marriage, until the day when Noe went into the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. So it was, too, in the days of Lot; they ate, they drank, they bought and sold, they planted and built; but on the day when Lot went out of Sodom, a rain of fire and brimstone came from heaven and destroyed them all. And so it will be, in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.” Luke 17:26-30
It’s rather curious that Jesus would tie in the flood of Noah with the destruction of Sodom. Even more curious is that He would mention marriage. St. Matthew gives a similar account, and while some of the details are different, he also mentions what Jesus said about marriage in relation to the flood of Noah and the return of the Son of Man:
 “When the Son of Man comes, all will be as it was in the days of Noe; in those days before the flood, they went on eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the time when Noe entered the ark, and they were taken unawares, when the flood came and drowned them all; so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.” Matthew 24:37-39
Deluge
On the face of it, it seems that Jesus is simply saying that people will just be carrying on about their business as usual when disaster strikes. But the connection of the destruction of the world by flood to the destruction of Sodom by fire is a theme repeated by the Miracle at Fatima, and again (as you will see) at Akita, Japan. Because of this theme, Our Blessed Lord’s mention of “marrying and giving in marriage” seems to be more euphemistic, and the understanding of the ancient Jews with regard to the Flood of Noah may provide a clue.
 The Jewish commentary on Genesis known as the Midrash says that God sent the flood to destroy the world because perverse marriages (male to male and man to beast) had been legalized.
 “The generation of the Flood were not blotted out from the world until they composed nuptial songs (until they wrote marriage deeds for males and beasts — i.e. they fully legalized such practices) in honor of pederasty and bestiality.” – Midrash, GENESIS (BERESHITH) [XXVI. 4-5] p. 213
Book of Enoch
In addition to the Midrash is the apocryphal Book of Enoch. The Book of Enoch is believed to have been composed sometime between the second and first century BC, and was regarded as authentic by Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Tertullian, and St. Augustine. While the text is not considered to have been inspired by the Holy Spirit, it is worth noting that the Book of Enoch also affirms the idea that the reason God sent a flood to wipe out the earth for wide-spread practice of sodomy:
 “For I know the wickedness of mankind, how [they have rejected my commandments and] they will not carry the yoke which I have placed on them. But they will cast off my yoke, and they will accept a different yoke. And they will sow worthless seed, not fearing God and not worshiping me, but they began to worship vain gods, and they renounced my uniqueness.
And all the world will be reduced to confusion by iniquities and wicked- nesses and [abominable] fornications that is, friend with friend in the anus, and every other kind of wicked uncleanness which it is disgusting to report, and the worship of (the) evil (one). And that is why I shall bring down the flood onto the earth, and I shall destroy everything, and the earth itself will collapse in great darkness.”
Homosexual Rome
It should also be noted that Emperor Nero, largely regarded by the Church Fathers as a prefigurement of the Anti-Christ, is the first ruler of the Western World to have legitimized same-sex ‘marriages,’ participating in at least two himself.
In light of this, it would appear that the cause of the Flood may have been the legalization of perverse marriages. So when Our Lord recalls “the days of Noah,” mentions “marriage and giving in marriage”, and then also recalls the destruction of Sodom, it would appear that the punishments for such crimes against nature are quite severe. It is also interesting that the miracle of Fatima appears to recall the deluge with heavy rains dissipated by a brilliant display of the colors of the rainbow, followed by the sun threatening to burn up the world. But it doesn’t end there.
 
Akita
I
Weeping Statue at Akita Japan
n 1973, Our Lady spoke to a deaf nun in Akita Japan. On the anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun, October 13, 1973, Our Lady said:
 “My dear daughter, listen well to what I have to say to you. You will inform your superior. As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will never seen before. Fire will fall from the sky and will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well as the bad, sparing neither priests nor faithful. The survivors will find themselves so desolate that they will envy the dead. The only arms which will remain for you will be the Rosary and the Sign left by My Son. Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. With the Rosary, pray for the Pope, the bishops and priests.”
Cardinal Raymond Burke was one of the principal authors and supporters
of the book defending the Church's teachings on marriage
that was allegedly blocked by Cardinal Baldisseri.
 “The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres…churches and altars sacked; the Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.
St. Wolfgang and the devil
 “The demon will be especially implacable against souls consecrated to God. The thought of the loss of so many souls is the cause of my sadness. If sins increase in number and gravity, there will be no longer pardon for them”

 “With courage, speak to your superior. He will know how to encourage each one of you to pray and to accomplish works of reparation.”
 
 
Sodom
Sodom and Gomorrah
These are incredibly sobering words if we take them in the context presented above. Again, our Lady recalls the deluge, and then speaks of fire falling from the sky, which harkens to the destruction of Sodom. If homosexual acts were the spiritual cause of both cataclysms, then the recollection of them in regard to our time bears a striking significance. Even more disturbing is what Our Lady said at Akita about bishops opposing bishops and cardinals opposing cardinals. Can it be a coincidence that the upcoming Synod on the Family, which has already opened the door to discussion on “irregular” relationships and homosexuality, will be held in October, during the 98th anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun? Can it be a coincidence that the symbol that self-professed homosexuals have claimed for themselves, recalling the great deluge, is the rainbow?
Pray the Rosary
 The book of Genesis tells us that 100 years transpired from the time that God told Noah to build an Ark to the day of the Deluge. As the 100th anniversary of Fatima rapidly approaches, let us not be found outside the Ark, but remain safely aboard the Ark of the Church. So,... let us commit to pray the Rosary daily for the salvation of souls, reparation for sins, and for the restoration of All things in Christ.

 
Shared from the Lepanto Institute